Healthy Models: Why Normal Shouldn’t Be The Goal

Recently American Eagle’s aerie brand (a lingerie and loungewear line) launched a campaign called #aerieReal in which their models are depicted without retouching leaving “imperfections” on display.  (Read More about it HERE)

Great idea right?

Well almost as soon as the applause started, so did the backlash.  Throughout social media, well-meaning individuals argued that while the models remained untouched they weren’t representative of normal women.

aerie 1This made me think and I came to a conclusion that some people may find offensive:

We shouldn’t want our fashion and beauty ads to depict normal women.  Because, normal does not equal healthy.

We are all aware of media’s emphasis on the thin body and what has been deemed fat shaming.  I don’t debate these issues for a second.  But what worries me is the reactionary pendulum swing that I have been observing over the past few years.

There has been a public outcry to embrace and promote the “normal” body, especially in fashion and beauty ads.  And by “normal” I mean the average-sized body.  Unfortunately that is not necessarily a good thing.  According to 2009/2010 number released by the CDC, 69.2% of US adults 20 or older are overweight (including obesity).

Consequently, the idea of replacing anorexic images in the media with the average aka “normal” person is frightening.  Aren’t we then simply running the risk of creating a culture of unhealthiness at the other extreme?

aerie 2Both sides come with a slew of potential health problems.  So why are we insisting we promote either side in order to make people feel comfortable?

I know we all look different.  I understand that we come in different sizes and that we face different challenges –especially surrounding our weight (be it eating disorders, thyroid issues, PCOS, or a slew of other legitimate medical complications).  But that doesn’t mean we should give up on the aspirational; that we should simply embrace the status quo.

aerie 3

Wouldn’t the logical step be to promote healthy models and in turn healthy bodies?  As in, the body with a healthy percentage of fat (not BMI, as it can be misleading)?  Advertisements are aspirational at their core, promoting products that will in some way make our lives better.  I believe the people in these ads should represent that same goal.  Especially when the product being promoted is intrinsically tied to our bodies.

Being healthy doesn’t automatically mean being a size 0-2, but it doesn’t mean the average clothing size, 14-16 (in the US) is healthy either.  Depending on several factors (height, muscluator, etc), anywhere within that range (and perhaps even outside it!) can be deemed healthy for a particular individual.  Additional factors should also be considered, for instance even if your numbers all fall in the healthy range, but you carry your weight at your waistline the CDC tells us that you are at a higher risk for type 2 diabetes and heart disease.

I want to be clear:  in no way am I suggesting that people who fall in the unhealthy categories (on either side of the pendulum) should be shamed, or that companies shouldn’t create products for people in all categories.  Also, this post is not about the #aerieREAL campaign (that was just the inspiration).  What I am saying is, individuals that we see in ads should fall in the healthy aspirational category.  Not simply the “normal” or “real” categories that I keep hearing public outcry for.

What do you want to see when looking at models in campaigns?  Are you for or against retouching?  And in the case of aerie, do you feel like they’ve gone far enough?  Do you agree that normal does not equal healthy?

Coco Rocha For Target Shows Us How To Model

For those of you content with just standing there, in her latest ad for Target, Coco Rocha shows us that modeling is much more of a sport:

Am I the only one tired from just watching?!

 

Image of Coco Rocha for Target via targetstyle.tumblr.com and video via Target’s YouTube page.

 

Bring Back The Models!

Future Claw Magazine Issue 5 interviewed Niki Taylor back at the end of January and as always she was lovely and insightful.  In fact, there was one particular quote that made an impression.  When asked what changes she would like to see in the fashion industry, Ms. Taylor answered, “Put models back on covers of magazines and in campaigns and let the movie stars do movies.”  Preach, sister.  Preach.  Now, don’t get me wrong.  I do love the occasional celebrity in conjunction with the insightful interview.  But, sometimes I just want a good old-fashioned super model.  Give me Niki, Claudia, Cindy, Linda and even some crazy Naomi (yes, I could go on…)!!!  These women were more than clothes hangers.  They were able to communicate a lifestyle simply by posing for photos- a skill many film actors seem to lack.

Niki Taylor, Elle, March 1991

Fortunately, it seem Ms. Taylor wasn’t the only one thinking this.  As many current titles seem to be showcasing true models (including 3 of the current issues Vogue from around the globe- seen below).  And with them that feeling, that joie de vivre (that had disappeared with the influx of stiff movie stars and overexposed musicians) comes rushing back.  Hopefully this is a trend that will stick around for a while.

Constance Jablonski, Vogue Deutsch, March 2011

Izabel Goulart, Vogue Nippon, March 2011

Gisele Bündchen, Vogue Türkiye, March 2011